Apologetics Made Simple

Equipping the Next Generation of Believers

  • Home
  • About
    • Biography
    • Statement of Faith
    • This Website’s Purpose
  • My Books
    • Apologetics Made Simple
    • Building Wealth Made Simple
  • Ask a Question
  • Contact Me
  • Store
  • Become A Patron
  • Articles
    • Defending the Faith
    • Addressing My Critics
    • Critques of Atheism
    • Current Issues
    • Biblical Living
    • Philosophy
    • Young-Earth Creationism vs. Evolution
  • Film Reviews
  • Book Reviews
  • Q + A
  • Media
    • Debates
    • Written Debates
    • YouTube Videos

The Epistemological Argument Against Atheism

January 30, 2018 by Jason Petersen 2 Comments

atheist, induction

 

In 2013, I made an epistemological argument against atheism from modal logic. In this article, I will present this argument again, but it will be a more clear and concise presentation.

A Framework is Needed

In order to discern a true proposition from a false one, you must have some sort of methodology for making a distinction between a true belief and a false belief.

The Problem of Induction

Since there is no omniscient being given the truth of atheism, all knowledge (the possession of the truth) must be acquired inductively.[ref] Unfortunately for our dear atheists, induction cannot be an account for knowledge. There are several reasons for this:

1. In induction, the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion.

2. Since the truth of the conclusion is not guaranteed, all conclusions that are reached through induction are probabilistic.

3. You cannot validly reason to a universal truth from a particular truth by using induction.

4. There is no rule in logic that allows for the validity of inductive inferences.

The Consequences of Being Stuck with Induction

Since induction only draws conclusions on the basis of probability, there is always a possibility of the conclusion being false. Because there is no way to demonstrate the truth of the conclusion by using induction, atheists are stuck in skepticism. They say they try to evaluate the claims on the basis of evidence, but evidence is acquired inductively. Just because they think they see evidence for a claim doesn’t make the claim in question true. Thus, there is no interpretative framework for atheists that allow them to discern true propositions from false ones. Thus, atheists are stuck in epistemological skepticism.

The Epistemological Argument from Atheism

Given what has been discussed, I will construct a hypothetical syllogism.

1. If atheism is true (A), atheists can only begin with induction (B).[ref]

2. If atheists can only begin with induction (B), it is not possible for them to know anything to be true (C).

3. Therefore, if atheism is true (A), atheists cannot know anything to be true (C).

 

Footnotes:

1. In this article, ‘induction’ is defined as an argument or process of probabilistic inference.

 

My book on Apologetics:

 

Filed Under: Articles, Critques of Atheism, Polemics Tagged With: Apologetics, atheism, epistemological argument against atheism, Epistemology, induction

Comments

  1. Justin Wishart says

    February 1, 2018 at 2:13 am

    What do you mean by the word “use” in your argument? Atheists can use deductive logic fine, but I think you are using the word “use” in a specific way.

    Reply
    • jasonpetersen says

      February 1, 2018 at 6:22 pm

      Justin,

      Good question. When I say, ‘use,’ there is an element to the term that specifies the necessity of inference. I’ll add a foot note. Thanks!

      EDIT: I was going to add a footnote, but it ended up being too complex. I change the language of the argument instead. Thanks again, Justin!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search this Website

My Book

Copyright © 2021 · Author Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.